Spitzer Sees Light From Faraway Worlds
Posted on: Wednesday, 21 February 2007, 14:20 CST
NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has captured for the first time enough light from planets outside our solar system, known as exoplanets, to identify signatures of molecules in their atmospheres. The landmark achievement is a significant step toward being able to detect possible life on rocky exoplanets and comes years before astronomers had anticipated.
"This is an amazing surprise," said Spitzer project scientist Dr. Michael Werner of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. "We had no idea when we designed Spitzer that it would make such a dramatic step in characterizing exoplanets."
Spitzer, a space-based infrared telescope, obtained the detailed data, called spectra, for two different gas exoplanets. Called HD 209458b and HD 189733b, these so-called "hot Jupiters" are, like Jupiter, made of gas, but orbit much closer to their suns.
The data indicate the two planets are drier and cloudier than predicted. Theorists thought hot Jupiters would have lots of water in their atmospheres, but surprisingly none was found around HD 209458b and HD 189733b. According to astronomers, the water might be present but buried under a thick blanket of high, waterless clouds.
Those clouds might be filled with dust. One of the planets, HD 209458b, showed hints of tiny sand grains, called silicates, in its atmosphere. This could mean the planet's skies are filled with high, dusty clouds unlike anything seen around planets in our own solar system.
"The theorists' heads were spinning when they saw the data," said Dr. Jeremy Richardson of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
"It is virtually impossible for water, in the form of vapor, to be absent from the planet, so it must be hidden, probably by the dusty cloud layer we detected in our spectrum," he said. Richardson is lead author of a Nature paper appearing Feb. 22 that describes a spectrum for HD 209458b.
In addition to Richardson's team, two other groups of astronomers used Spitzer to capture spectra of exoplanets. A team led by Dr. Carl Grillmair of NASA's Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif., observed HD 189733b, while a team led by Dr. Mark R. Swain of JPL focused on the same planet in the Richardson study, and came up with similar results. Grillmair's results will be published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. Swain's findings have been submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
A spectrum is created when an instrument called a spectrograph splits light from an object into its different wavelengths, just as a prism turns sunlight into a rainbow. The resulting pattern of light, the spectrum, reveals "fingerprints" of chemicals making up the object.
Until now, the only planets for which spectra were available belonged in our own solar system. The planets in the Spitzer studies orbit stars that are so far away, they are too faint to be seen with the naked eye. HD 189733b is 370 trillion miles away in the constellation Vulpecula, and HD 209458b is 904 trillion miles away in the constellation Pegasus. That means both planets are at least about a million times farther away from us than Jupiter. In the future, astronomers hope to have spectra for smaller, rocky planets beyond our solar system. This would allow them to look for the footprints of life -- molecules key to the existence of life, such as oxygen and possibly even chlorophyll.
"With these new observations, we are refining the tools that we will one day need to find life elsewhere if it exists," said Swain. "It's sort of like a dress rehearsal."
Spitzer was able to tease out spectra from the feeble light of the two planets through what is known as the "secondary eclipse" technique. In this method -- first used by Spitzer in 2005 to directly detect the light from an exoplanet for the first time ( http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2005-09/index.shtml ) -- a so-called transiting planet is monitored as it circles behind its star, temporarily disappearing from our Earthly point of view. By measuring the dip in infrared light that occurs when the planet disappears, Spitzer can learn how much light is coming solely from the planet. The technique will work only in infrared wavelengths, where the planet is brighter than in visible wavelengths and stands out better next to the overwhelming glare of its star.
In the new studies, Spitzer's spectrograph, which measures infrared light at a range of wavelengths, stared at the two transiting planets as they orbited their stars. This allowed the astronomers to subtract the spectra of the stars from the spectra of the planets plus their stars to obtain spectra of the planets alone.
"When we first set out to make these observations, they were considered high risk because not many people thought they would work," said Grillmair. "But Spitzer has turned out to be superbly designed and more than up to the task."
Previous observations of HD 209458b by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope revealed individual elements, such as sodium, oxygen, carbon and hydrogen, that bounce around the very top of the planet, a region higher up than that probed in the Spitzer studies and a region where molecules like water would break apart. To do this, Hubble measured changes in the light from the star, not the planet, as the planet passed in front. The observations indicated less sodium than predicted, which again supports the idea that the planet is socked in with high clouds.
Astronomers hope to use Spitzer for additional studies of transiting exoplanets, which are those that cross in front of their stars from our point view. Of the approximately 200 known exoplanets, 14 are transiting. At least three of these in addition to HD 209458b and HD 189733b are candidates for obtaining spectra. Further spectral studies of HD 209458b and HD 189733b will also yield more information about the planets' atmospheres.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology, also in Pasadena. Caltech manages JPL for NASA. Spitzer's infrared spectrograph was built by Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Its development was led by Dr. Jim Houck of Cornell.
---
On the Net:
For artist's concepts and more information, visit http://www.nasa.gov/spitzer and www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media .
Related Articles
- Kepler Detects an Exoplanet Atmosphere
- NASA Needs Mars and Venus Manned Mission, Say Robert Weiner and Zoe Pagonis as Man-On-Moon 40th Anniversary Approaches; 'NASA's Not Dreaming Far Enough' Orlando Sentinel Op-Ed
- Spitzer Warming Up To New Career
- World Book Takes Students Out of This World With Special Feature on Mars: Exploring the Red Planet; Feature Taps NASA, Leading Experts in Space Exploration
- Spitzer Captures Cosmic Mountains of Creation
- Field Guide Created for Confirming New Earth-like Planets
- Red Planet Reconnaissance
- OUR OPINION Keep eye on Red Planet news Two NASA rovers will hunt for signs of life on Mars and provide stunning images along the way.
- Frozen Light: Cool NASA Research Holds Promise
- NASA Hopes to Capture Cosmic Nursery
User Comments (159)
| 9. |
Posted by Mr Poe on 02/21/2007, 16:36 This is such bull. There is no way that picture is legit. I can already see major pixel flaws, and I'm looking at it with a standard Dell monitor. Trillions of miles away? Yeah right. If that's the case, why don't we have every detail of our solar system down to a cm? We still barely know anything about most of the planets in our solar system, and yet they're trying to convince me that they can explain details on this one? |
| 8. |
Posted by Bob E. on 02/21/2007, 16:30 It constatnly amazes me how ignorant conservatives always turn there nose up at science. It must be their limited mental capacity. |
| 7. |
Posted by Gray on 02/21/2007, 16:27 Irving - If you're waiting on a PICTURE to believe in science, you won't get one during your lifetime. There is no PICTURE that proves relativity, only formula, theories and massive amounts of data. Until you can believe that, go back to creationist school. |
| 6. |
Posted by felngsr on 02/21/2007, 16:26 They can tell it is not a star by the significant lack of mass and the fact that it orbits a star. Maybe you should stop reading that intelligent design crap and study some real science. A star that doesn't twinkle, what the hell are you smoking? |
| 5. |
Posted by Unemployed Farmer on 02/21/2007, 16:12 Great discovery! Now if we could ever find a way to fix our own planet. |
| 4. |
Posted by Ima Doubtertoo on 02/21/2007, 15:57 If our very best telescopes like the Hubble can only resolve a picture of the Moon down to a single pixel being the size of a sixty yard sqaure, and the Moon is only 250,000 miles away, how realistic do you think it is that these guys can supposedly see something that is trillions of miles away? Believe it when they show you a picture of the site on the Moon where Apollo landed and planted the flag - a picture taken from the Hubble. |
| 3. |
Posted by Irving Stinkfinger on 02/21/2007, 15:50 How do they KNOW what they are looking at are exoplanets and not just stars that don\'t twinkle as expected? Without a PICTURE of the so-called planets, I\'m not buying this bologna. |
| 2. |
Posted by smee on 02/21/2007, 15:42 that's really cool |
| 1. |
Posted by LIL "D" on 02/21/2007, 15:04 This is so cool can you write a book for me please. My name is Daniel R. Watson. P.S. Science is so awsome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |


RSS Feeds