Garmin Forerunner 210 Best GPS Running Watch According To HRWC

July 27, 2013

The Garmin Forerunner 210 is still the best GPS running watch according to the Heart Rate Watch Company. Factors cited for the selection included lightweight, great training software and features, including the ability to work with foot pods for cadence.

Bozeman, MT (PRWEB) July 27, 2013

The Garmin Forerunner 210 is still the best GPS running watch according to testers at the Heart Rate Watch Company.


"The Forerunner 210 only weighs 1.8 ounces making it one of the very lightest fully integrated GPS watches", says Rusty Squire, President of the Heart Rate Watch Company. He adds, "The fact that elite marathoner Ryan Hall runs with it tells me about everything I need to know".


"The Garmin Connect training software will map the full run with elevations, heart rate data from start to finish and even record each mile time if you have miles set up as laps", says Squire. He adds, "This helps a lot with pacing work in trying to steady your pace from start to finish".

"We like the Timex Run Trainer 2.0, especially its cadence only feature, but Timex Training Peaks free version software is weak unless you pay for the pro version", says Squire.


The Garmin 210 offers both average and real-time pace. "Average pace is good for races when you are trying to stay on target with a minutes per mile pace and real-time pace is necessary for intervals", says Squire.

This Garmin GPS watch also delivers heart rate data and distance in miles, or kilometers, to the hundredth. "It's got everything a runner needs for data, lightweight and a great software", says Squire.

This GPS watch also comes in a bundle with a foot pod called the Garmin Forerunner 210 Club Bundle.


"If you want a great deal on the best GPS running watch out there then simply call us at 866-586-7129", says Squire. He adds, "We also give you two free books I authored on heart rate monitor based training".

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/7/prweb10970952.htm

Source: prweb

comments powered by Disqus