Quantcast

New Study Reveals Important Accuracy Differences Between Clear-Label Sensors

February 25, 2014

Distinct differences between label sensor technologies must be understood if one is going to make the best choice for each label application scenario. Lion Precision's new study reveals those important differences.

St. Paul, Minn. (PRWEB) February 25, 2014

Several clear label sensor technologies are now available with distinct differences between them. Making the correct choice for each label application scenario will determine long-term success or frustration. Test results from Lion Precision, who provides label sensors using all available technologies, show distinct differences in regard to registration accuracy. "There are several advantages and disadvantages to each technology," according to Mark Kretschmar, communication manager for Lion Precision. "The typical end-user or machine designer doesn’t have the time or inclination to search out the differences for such a small piece of the labeling system, but the differences can matter, especially at higher speeds. As the leading clear label sensor provider, we felt compelled to discover and share the accuracies of each of our technologies."

Lion Precision designed and built a machine using a rotary encoder and a gear belt to precisely control the location of label edges on a loop of ordinary paper labels. The system is capable of measuring label edge position with better than one micron of accuracy. Sensors using each of four technologies (optical, ultrasonic, and two types of capacitive) were tested on the device with web speeds of 70 meters/minute and 220 meters/minute. Comparing the results showed the distinct differences. "The results were very clear," said Kretschmar. "The capacitive technology registered no errors, even at 220 meters-per-minute." Optical sensors showed a small decrease in accuracy at the higher speed. Ultrasonic sensors, while having the advantage of working with the largest range of label materials, showed considerably larger errors and a clear negative relationship between web speed and registration accuracy. Kretschmar cautions, "Registration accuracy is not the only factor in making a label sensor choice. Each technology can struggle with certain types of label and liner materials and have different setup procedures." If registration accuracy is of paramount importance, ultrasonic sensors are not the best choice, especially at higher speeds. If using slower speeds and the primary concern is usability on the widest range of materials, ultrasonic may be a good choice.

The LRD8200, Lion Precision’s newest clear label sensor, uses ultrasonic technology. "It isn’t always about having the latest gadget or technology," according to company president, Don Martin. "For users concerned with registration accuracy at high speeds, we steer them toward the capacitive sensors because they will get better results, even though it isn’t the newest technology; newer isn’t always better."

Detailed results of the test are available as a web page or PDF at http://www.labelsensors.com, a new site dedicated to helping users make the best sensor choice.

For more information, contact Lion Precision:

Lion Precision

563 Shoreview Park Road

St. Paul, MN 55126 USA

651-484-6544

http://www.lionprecision.com

info(at)lionprecision(dot)com

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/02/prweb11610762.htm


Source: prweb



comments powered by Disqus