Quantcast
Last updated on June 1, 2012 at 9:28 EDT

Defense’s Take On FBI Explosives Report Called Flawed

February 5, 2008
Repost This

By Chris Echegaray and Elaine Silvestrini, Tampa Tribune, Fla.

Feb. 5–TAMPA — A federal prosecutor says a defense attorney’s review of an FBI report on two suspended University of South Florida students is flawed, according to court papers filed Monday.

In a response to Youssef Megahed’s motion, prosecutor Jay Hoffer writes that Megahed’s attorney’s review of the “nature and meaning of the evidence as to the contents of the” vehicle is flawed.

Megahed’s attorney, Assistant Federal Public Defender Adam Allen, argued the FBI report shows a “harmless pyrotechnic mixture” was found in the trunk of the car Megahed and Ahmed Mohamed were in. Allen is seeking bail for Megahed.

Hoffer wrote in his motion that he opposes consideration for bail. Hoffer states Allen mischaracterized the report and that the FBI lab described the items in the trunk as dangerous depending on their use and their surroundings.

The two were arrested Aug. 4 in South Carolina after deputies found what they called explosives in their trunk. They have been held without bail and charged with illegally transporting explosives.

Mohamed also has been charged with trying to aid terrorists via a video showing how to use a remote control toy to detonate a bomb.

Meanwhile, Allen is citing comments made on as a reason potential jurors need to be carefully screened before Megahed and Mohamed go on trial.

One reader called Megahed a “terrorist.”

That person and another said they wanted to be on his jury so they could hang him.

The trial is scheduled for March.

Allen has asked that potential jurors be given questionnaires similar to those distributed in the trial of Sami Al-Arian. Allen wrote in his earlier motion that he fears his client will not be able to get a fair trial in Tampa. Monday, Allen filed a supplemental motion citing the TBO comments and submitting his proposed questions for jurors.

“These readers’ responses justify the need for a jury questionnaire in the present case because they show that strong opinions have already been formed by potential members of the jury pool as to the guilt or innocence of the defendants,” Allen wrote. “Additionally, these responses show that potential jury pool members are likely to be more candid in their opinions when given the opportunity to express those opinions anonymously and in writing.”

Reporter Elaine Silvestrini can be reach at (813) 259-7837 or esilvestrini@tampatrib.com.

—–

To see more of the Tampa Tribune or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.tampatrib.com.

Copyright (c) 2008, Tampa Tribune, Fla.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.