Quantcast
Last updated on May 31, 2012 at 19:03 EDT

CBS, Fox Take Different Routes in Technology Race

January 24, 2006
Repost This

By DAVID BAUDER Associated Press writer

PASADENA, Calif. — In the fast-moving world of technology, Fox is the tortoise and CBS is the hare.

CBS has spent the past few months making deals to distribute the network’s fare in every conceivable way — on the Internet, through on-demand services, on iPods, on cell phones. Fox has been content to mostly watch this frenzied activity from the sidelines.

Considering their images as TV networks, it’s a fascinating reversal of type. In this tech race, CBS, with the oldest average audience, is the teenager careening wildly from experience to experience. Fox, home of “The Simpsons,” is the conservative elder taking it all in.

CBS doesn’t want to be caught on the sidelines — like the music industry once was — if a new form of content distribution catches fire with the public.

“This is all emerging so quickly,” said Nina Tassler, CBS entertainment president. “My husband just learned how to e-mail, and yet my son has been communicating on his cell phone for the past two years. So I don’t think anybody really knows where we’re headed. But it is imperative that we make our content available to audiences where they are and when they want to watch it.”

CBS hitched up with the Internet’s hottest company, Google Inc., to make copies of “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation” and other shows available for rent online. David Letterman jokes and news clips can be played on cell phones.

The oddest pairing of all: Andy Rooney commentaries on your iPod.

The experimentation extends to creators. CBS is producing a soap opera in three-minute chunks exclusively for use on cell phones. Last week it announced a “micro-series,” about a man trying to save his kidnapped wife, that will be shown on both the TV network and cell phones in installments of 60 seconds or less.

Peter Liguori, Fox entertainment president, said, “I don’t think it’s a wise idea to throw everything at the wall.”

Fox’s only major deal has been to make reruns of series like “24″ and “Prison Break” available for 99 cents to DirecTV subscribers. Its cable sister, FX, will sell downloads of some of its series to people who have DirecTV digital video recorders before they actually air.

Fox and DirecTV are both owned by News Corp.

“We’re taking a more measured approach to what works and what may not work,” Liguori said. “The world of new technology is the quintessential marathon, not a sprint, and we’re looking at it accordingly.”

It’s worth noting that News Corp., unlike the corporate owners of the other big television networks, is aligned with a TV content distributor in DirecTV, said Josh Bernoff, principal analyst for the Forrester Group.

These new forms of distribution don’t exactly help satellite and cable companies. They encourage people to bypass them.

The fear is that if people become used to watching television programs when and where they want to — not when the networks schedule them — the advertiser-supported TV model will crumble.

CBS dismisses these worries. By its actions, the network believes that the new distribution will only make people more interested in watching its programs on TV. The theory is that the number of people who become regular viewers will outnumber the people who abandon TV to watch their programs elsewhere.