Attorney General Sues at&T Over Bill Errors
Posted on: Tuesday, 4 May 2004, 06:00 CDT
Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist turned up the heat Friday on AT&T Corp., charging in a lawsuit that the telecommunications giant added bogus $10 long-distance charges to consumer bills and then coerced people to sign up for phone service when they asked for a refund.
More than 500 consumers have contacted Crist's office since April 23 saying they were billed falsely. Many of them also have said when they contact the company for a refund, AT&T says they must sign up for service first, Crist said.
Crist's suit, filed in Leon County, charges Bedminster, N.J.- based AT&T with violating the state's Unfair and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
"This practice is outrageous," Crist said. "Consumers called AT&T seeking a refund, and instead of help, they were told they must sign up with AT&T to get their own money back."
Crist is asking for $10,000 for each billing incident. AT&T officials could not be reached for comment Friday.
More than 100 people also have called the Florida Public Service Commission and the Office of Public Counsel since January, when AT&T began adding a $3.95 monthly fee to its bills.
AT&T has blamed a computer glitch for the extra charges. About 1 million customers nationwide are believed to have been improperly billed. AT&T apologized for the incident in a statement last month and told customers they would receive a credit or a refund by June.
"It is important to note that these are billing errors only and AT&T has not engaged in slamming or unauthorized switch activity," the statement said.
Wellington resident Lorrie Miller began butting heads with AT&T when she received a bill for $8.77 after her son used his AT&T Wireless cellphone to make a call. Miller, 44, who uses Supra Telecom for her local phone service and calling cards to make long- distance calls, was told that she must sign up for an AT&T plan in order to not receive any more charges from the phone company.
"I remember telling her that this didn't sound right, and I felt uncomfortable with it," Miller said.
She said she then received a letter from AT&T confirming the company had changed her local phone service, and she began writing letters to AT&T.
"If I don't have to deal with them anymore, I'd be very happy," she said.
kristi_swartz@pbpost.com
Related Articles
- Revised Transmission Service Charges Approved for Metropolitan Edison and Pennsylvania Electric
- Damaka Launches DialOut(TM) Service for PC-to-Phone Calling - Price of Phone Calls Continues to Drop
- Cingular to Charge $5 for Older Phones
- Cellular Service to Offer MySpace Phones
- Man Charged in Cell-Phone Assault Case
- HOAX BOMB CALL SUSPECT IS CHARGED ; Airport Was Phoned 3 Times
- Free Services on Verizon Wireless Phones Help Southern California Parents and Teens Manage Usage Costs Daily
- World-East Development Plans to Bundle TCOM's SEO4Mobile Service With Its Mobile Phone Sales Pack
- Agency Tells Ohioans to Look for Erroneous AT&T Charges on Their Phone Bills
- Consumer Spending on Wireless Service to Overtake Landline Phone Spending
User Comments (0)

RSS Feeds