Court Upholds Anti-Spam Law Against Spammer
Posted on: Wednesday, 30 June 2004, 06:00 CDT
SEATTLE (AP) -- An appeals court upheld the state's tough anti-spam law in a closely watched case against a man who claimed he did not know some of his e-mail was going to Washington state residents.
The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the Washington Court of Appeals rejected an appeal by Jason Heckel of Salem, Ore., doing business as Natural Instincts and promoting a "How to Profit From the Internet" package for $39.95.
The case, filed in 1998, was the first under Washington's law against unsolicited junk e-mail. The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to consider a claim that the state law violated the U.S. Constitution's interstate commerce clause.
Federal anti-spam legislation went into effect Jan. 1, and leading Internet companies have sued hundreds of people accused of violating it.
Monday's state appellate decision upheld a 2002 decision ordering Heckel to pay nearly $100,000 in fines and court costs.
Heckel never disputed sending hundreds of thousands of e-mail solicitations a month but claimed that Washington state should have been required to prove that he knew specific addressees were Washington state residents.
Under that interpretation, "no spammer sending deceptive e-mail could ever violate the act as long as he were to use a bulk e-mail program to harvest large numbers of addresses without regard to residence of the owners," Judge Faye C. Kennedy wrote for the panel.
Heckel's lawyer, Dale L. Crandall, said he had not decided whether to appeal. "These are complex issues," he said.
-----
On the Net:
More science, space, and technology from RedNova
Copyright © 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
Related Articles
- United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Rebukes CTS Cement and Owner Edward K. Rice, According to Ultimax Cement
- Medical Malpractice Victim Helps Uphold Constitutional Rights of Patients in Washington State Supreme Court Decision, Perey Law Announces
- Court Denies Appeal On Light Cigarettes
- AnalogicTech Comments on United States Court of Appeals Ruling
- On March 4, 2009, The United States Supreme Court Rejected the Rationale Behind Michigan's Drug Product Liability Law
- American States Water Company Announces Court of Appeal Order in Affirming Dismissal of Court Cases
- U.S. Court of Appeals Affirms Air Permit for the Prairie State Energy Campus
- Whistleblower Lawsuit Against Hewlett-Packard for Medical Products Fraud Allowed to Proceed -- State Court of Appeals Reverses Superior Court Dismissal, Announces Law Firm
- State High Court Lets Stand Detox Ruling: Refusal to Hear Appeal May Affect Plans for Lynn Twp. Site.
- The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Today Addressed Rural Telephone Carrier Challenges
 |
 |
User Comments (0)
RSS Feeds