Quantcast
  • E-mail
  • Print
  • Comment
  • Font Size
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Discuss article

New Rules Make Firms Track E-Mails, IMs

Posted on: Friday, 1 December 2006, 00:00 CST

WASHINGTON - U.S. companies will need to keep track of all the e-mails, instant messages and other electronic documents generated by their employees thanks to new federal rules that go into effect Friday, legal experts say.

The rules, approved by the Supreme Court in April, require companies and other entities involved in federal litigation to produce "electronically stored information" as part of the discovery process, when evidence is shared by both sides before a trial.

The change makes it more important for companies to know what electronic information they have and where. Under the new rules, an information technology employee who routinely copies over a backup computer tape could be committing the equivalent of "virtual shredding," said Alvin F. Lindsay, a partner at Hogan & Hartson LLP and expert on technology and litigation.

James Wright, director of electronic discovery at Halliburton Co., said that large companies are likely to face higher costs from organizing their data to comply with the rules. In addition to e-mail, companies will need to know about things more difficult to track, like digital photos of work sites on employee cell phones and information on removable memory cards, he said.

Both federal and state courts have increasingly been requiring the production of relevant electronic documents during discovery, but the new rules codify the practice, legal experts said.

The rules also require that lawyers provide information about where their clients' electronic data is stored and how accessible it is much earlier in a lawsuit than was previously the case.

There are hundreds of "e-discovery vendors" and these businesses raked in approximately $1.6 billion in 2006, Wright said. That figure could double in 2007, he added.

Another expense will likely stem from the additional time lawyers will have to spend reviewing electronic documents before turning them over to the other side. While the amount of data will be narrowed by electronic searches, some high-paid lawyers will still have to sift through casual e-mails about subjects like "office birthday parties in the pantry" in order to find information relevant to a particular case.

Martha Dawson, a partner at the Seattle-based law firm of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP who specializes in electronic discovery, said the burden of the new rules won't be that great.

Companies will not have to alter how they retain their electronic documents, she said, but will have to do an "inventory of their IT system" in order to know better where the documents are.

The new rules also provide better guidance on how electronic evidence is to be handled in federal litigation, including guidelines on how companies can seek exemptions from providing data that isn't "reasonably accessible," she said. This could actually reduce the burden of electronic discovery, she said.


Source: Associated Press/AP Online

More News in this Category


Related Articles



Rating: 3.3 / 5 (11 votes)
Rate this article:
1/52/53/54/55/5

User Comments (21)

21. Posted by rrko on 03/30/2008, 13:28
ARKO13
20. Posted by M Moseley on 12/11/2006, 12:57
I'm like the one person wanting to know where are these rules. All I've ever head is on newslinks. Is this made up or what? I am not putting my employees through it until I see the law in print. Got any suggest where the "print" is?
19. Posted by R. Lee on 12/11/2006, 08:50
Haqs anyone read these rules?? Has anyone found these rules?? All I can find are news articles saying they were approved by the USSC. Can anyone provide an authoritative link on this matter??
18. Posted by Derf on 12/07/2006, 09:17
How long do companies have to keep these records before they can safely destroy those data? Do data have to be stored even before federal litigation?
17. Posted by chode on 12/01/2006, 21:19
Use truecrypt to encrypt all your data, tor to surf and do IM, if you dont trust your workstation then use knoppix (ram based OS), use ssl at a minimum for anything personal, dont trust corporate workstation installs, check your keyboard and cables for keyghost like devices, I could go on... Anything you send over IM on your phone is already recorded (I am one of the people maintaining the servers that do this) and your conversations are already monitored by a keyword flagging system that alerts on certain combinations of phrases or words. Encrypt your speech if you are concerned.
16. Posted by iniziale on 12/01/2006, 21:19
If you don't say something or write something in an email - for fear of retaliation - then what have you lost? That's right ... your freedom of speech! The neo-cons have persistently tried to eliminate the Bill of Rights with new laws that are obviously unconstitutional. By passing the laws they gain huge rights for themselves by taking ours away. The founding fathers would roll over in their graves if they could see what is happening. Our Congress sold out the entire history, purpose, meaning and freedoms of what once was called the American way of life when they passed the Military Commissions Act recently. The bill is blatantly unconstitutional, but will remain law until the Supreme Court declares it unconstitutional, or Congress rewrites or does away with it. This insidious law serves as a back-door workaround that leaves only the 2nd and 3rd amendments to the Constitution intact. All other Amendment rights were wiped out in the passing of the Act. But amazingly, you didn't hear about that on the evening news, right?! Bush and the neo-cons have conspired to overthrow America by dismantling our Constitution. What are you going to do about it?
15. Posted by praxis22 on 12/01/2006, 18:11
Email correspondence eh? Like the bulk of employees that leave their out of office to reply to all that lovely SPAM. Then there are the ISP\'s that keep hold of your mail and send you message digest (Sophos) so you can just get the stuff you want, I wonder what will happen to them. Hotmail gets a lot of SPAM, now they can get rid of none of it, for shame :)
14. Posted by diseman d on 12/01/2006, 15:22
this country is just heading downhill more and more in passing days. it's just another way the government is tryijng to keep tabs on everyone. big brother now has more tools to incrimate the little freedom that we do have. that is the big picture, even if it is only companies that are in litigation. it's just a step closer to their goals of tightening the noose on freedom, that's the big picture here!
13. Posted by Eric on 12/01/2006, 14:17
#9, Ryan, what databse are you referring to?
12. Posted by Rob on 12/01/2006, 14:10
To #7 most your large scale companies already do this with your email, it's called an email SERVER. This law is basically trying to prevent companies from doing the OPPS, we didn't backup our data, routine; they love doing this in litigation. The government can already READ ALL YOUR EMAILS, MESSAGES AND THE LIKE and ALREADY LISTENS TO YOUR PHONE CALLS. Thank the Patriot Act.
11. Posted by j Shelton on 12/01/2006, 13:53
I do find it interesting that there are no provided links to the legislation ... it would be nice to be able to easily read it and answer our own questions. Many companies already do this. When appropriate management accesses the emails and finds out what's going on with their employees. For many of us - this is already the way of the world :( Government legislation regarding storage isn't really changing much.
10. Posted by Cameron on 12/01/2006, 13:33
D Comstock has it right. This is legislation about companies being able to produce all paper and electronic do***ents related to a court case in a timely manner. Companies unable to do so risk a ruling allowing opposing counsel unfettered access to all paper and electronic records.
9. Posted by Ryan on 12/01/2006, 12:11
I'm really disappointed with these laws. Although they are to uphold accountability I am worried that the database the US government is creating will pave the way to a police state.
8. Posted by B. Bane on 12/01/2006, 12:06
Look, we should expect this kinda crap because of so many large scandels. But how enforceable is this? What will stop people from personal emails?
7. Posted by PG on 12/01/2006, 11:56
To post #5: Well if a company is in litigation and is required to produce historical electronic communications - how can that be done if a company is NOT ALREADY doing that prior to being in litigation? Translation - ALL business must start doing this starting today!
6. Posted by Brian Smith on 12/01/2006, 11:51
email2.com is on the verge of releasing their Public Beta that apparently will solve all thee problems.
5. Posted by D. Comstock on 12/01/2006, 11:38
I dont think you are understanding the context of the new law. This is a law that applies to companies that are involved in Federal Litigation, not every company as a daily routine. It is meant to protect the digital evidence that is so easily hidden or destro*** either puposely or by simple routine processes.
4. Posted by A on 12/01/2006, 11:28
thats appalling. hope it never happens in the uk
3. Posted by Shaun Stevens on 12/01/2006, 11:23
Haven't we had enough jerk bosses in our lives ? www.winnipegjobshark.com
2. Posted by Dr. Krome on 12/01/2006, 08:42
This is a little over the top. 1) what the hell does the gov't care what a GAP or Walmart employee is writing to his/her friend's cell phone 2) what determines information that can be destro*** and what determines what needs to be kept? This seems to state that ALL US COMPANIES need to abide by this. What is to stop the "terrorists" from writing paper notes or speaking, will we have to record that too? Who will fund this? Not the ones who wrote the rules... not the experts (Martha Dawson and company) who sell you the spy products... more sullbhit legislation wasting yours and my tax $$$
1. Posted by D. Muller on 12/01/2006, 01:17
Creepy! If your employees aren't getting their work done, you fire them. If they are getting their work done, then all should be good, right?

Comment on this article

Your Name
Text from the image
Comment
max 1200 chars
* All fields are required