Latest Peer review Stories
Are scientists any good at judging the importance of the scientific work of others?
Authors need not worry about rejections, as a complete feedback based revision is done under this service (PRWEB) October 05, 2013
Acclaimed reviewers from the domains of law, social science, medical and surgical studies, literature and IT are now part of the team (PRWEB) October 05, 2013
A correspondent for the journal Science recently revealed that he had successfully published a bogus research paper in 157 open-access science journals.
Traditional peer review is not enough to ensure data quality amid the recent boom in scientific research findings.
Advanced Medical Reviews, a leading medical peer review organization, recently met all criteria for this comprehensive audit.
An international study of the work habits of conservation biologists suggests that they do work very hard — producing a substantial amount of work late at night and over weekends.
PLoS Medicine is a peer-reviewed medical journal established in October 2004. It is the second journal of the Public Library of Sciences, which publishes open-access material. All material in PLoS Medicine is published under the Creative Commons license. To fund the journal, the publication’s business model requires that authors pay publication costs. PLoS Medicine provides an innovative and influential venue for research and comment on the major challenges to human health worldwide. It...
PLoS ONE is an open-access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLoS). It was established in 2006 as a beta version. In August 2008 it moved from a weekly publication schedule to a daily one, publishing articles as soon as they became ready. In October 2008, it came out of “beta.” In September 2009, PLoS ONE made full online usage of every published article publicly available. The founding managing editor was Chris Surridge. He was succeeded by...
- A ceramic container used inside a fuel-fired kiln to protect pots from the flame.