Latest Pioglitazone Stories
Huge amount of damages awarded to New York man who was diagnosed with bladder cancer that jurors were told was caused by diabetes drug Actos.
A federal jury’s decision to award billions of dollars in damages to a bladder cancer patient who took Actos could mean that others in the same situation may also have a right to seek compensation.
In the wake of a federal jury’s decision to award $9 billion to a man who developed bladder cancer after using the diabetes drug Actos, Cancer Monthly says patients who took Actos should recognize
The Firm is currently offering free and confidential Actos lawsuit evaluations to individuals who allegedly developed bladder cancer after taking the diabetes drug for 12 months or longer.
The Japanese drug maker that was recently ordered to pay $6 billion to a man who claimed that his bladder cancer diagnosis was caused by Actos, makes several other drugs with the same active ingredient.
Takeda pharmaceutical company and marketing partner Eli Lilly have now been ordered by a Federal Court to pay for a Plaintiff's cancer injuries in connection with the drug Actos.
The cancer information website Cancer Monthly says bladder cancer patients who took Actos should not wait to seek legal advice, despite drug maker’s plans to appeal a federal jury’s ruling.
A recent published review of the link between Actos and bladder cancer suggests that a federal jury’s judgment against the drug’s manufacturer is justified. Raleigh,
Days after a federal jury announced a $9 billion dollar judgment against the drug’s manufacturers, Cancer Monthly is encouraging bladder cancer patients to know their rights. Raleigh,
A Louisiana jury’s decision to award $9 billion in damages to a man who says his bladder cancer was caused by the drug Actos could pave a new legal path for other bladder cancer patients.
- To play, gamble.
- To impose upon; delude; trick; humbug; also, to joke; chaff.
- A deceitful game or trick; trickery; humbug; nonsense.